nanog mailing list archives
Re: VoIP over IPsec
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 08:14:02 -0500
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:50:32AM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
Are Cisco routers not happy doing VoIP/IPsec/GRE in concert?Cisco routers (and some others) are somewhat jittery doing IPsec but if you keep your CPU utilization levels low enough, it shouldn´t pose a problem. I would expect to keep watching the performance as traffic levels increase. Pete
I've done voip over a pptp tunnel several different times with no real problems. This includes at hotels as well as at the last nanog. obviously there was no encryption.. but i'm not that exciting to listen to anyways ;-) - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- VoIP over IPsec Charles Youse (Feb 16)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Petri Helenius (Feb 16)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Jared Mauch (Feb 17)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Stephen Sprunk (Feb 16)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 17)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Charlie Clemmer (Feb 17)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Stephen Sprunk (Feb 17)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Steve Feldman (Feb 17)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 17)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Petri Helenius (Feb 17)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 18)
- RE: VoIP over IPsec David Luyer (Feb 18)
- RE: VoIP over IPsec Vadim Antonov (Feb 18)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 17)
- Re: VoIP over IPsec Petri Helenius (Feb 16)