nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]]
From: Bryan Bradsby <Bryan.Bradsby () capnet state tx us>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 14:08:46 -0600 (CST)
udp/1434 is not a reserved port. [...] legit traffic that picked a random port to use for an ad-hoc use.it isn't legit for what i have in my network though :-)
Really? So you're blocking udp/1434 both in and out? Got any DNS servers on your network? Any of your desktop clients use DNS? Recent versions of un*x BIND will pick a random port above 1024 for udp conversations. It can and has picked 1434. DNS clients will eventually timeout and fall back to another server, so any problems would be transient, but the packets were legit, right? -bryan bradsby Texas State Government Net
Current thread:
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] Joshua Smith (Feb 21)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] David Barak (Feb 21)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] Kevin Oberman (Feb 21)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] Johannes Ullrich (Feb 21)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] Kevin Oberman (Feb 21)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] Kevin Oberman (Feb 21)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] David Barak (Feb 21)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] Bryan Bradsby (Feb 21)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] E.B. Dreger (Feb 21)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] Doug Barton (Feb 21)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] alex (Feb 22)
- Re: [Re: [Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives]] E.B. Dreger (Feb 21)