nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP to doom us all
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:06:36 -0800
Cheap to buy, but the time for processing each certificate will increase with the size of the routing table, and we just end up replicating the problem of recalculating large routing tables, but now with certification, no?
no. you *really* may want to read up on sbgp before attempting to discuss its scaling qualities. randy
Current thread:
- Re: BGP to doom us all, (continued)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- RE: BGP to doom us all Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Sean Donelan (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Robertson (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Pinsky (Feb 28)