nanog mailing list archives
Re: US-Asia Peering
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 22:04:23 -0800 (PST)
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > Theres an increasing number of "psuedo-wire" connections tho, you could regard > these L2 extensions an extension of the switch as a whole making it > international. > Where the same pseudo wire provider connects to say LINX, AMSIX, DECIX your only > a little way off having an interconnection of multiple IXs, its possible this > will occur by accident .. Yes, that's an unfortunate accident that's occurred before. -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: US-Asia Peering, (continued)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen Stuart (Jan 03)
- Re: US-Asia Peering William B. Norton (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Bill Woodcock (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Randy Bush (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering William B. Norton (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Randy Bush (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering William B. Norton (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Paul Vixie (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen Stuart (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Bill Woodcock (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Neil J. McRae (Jan 10)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 10)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Bill Woodcock (Jan 10)
- Re: US-Asia Peering William B. Norton (Jan 10)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 11)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Paul Vixie (Jan 11)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 11)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Paul Vixie (Jan 11)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jan 12)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Paul Vixie (Jan 12)