nanog mailing list archives
RE: W32.SqlSlammer
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 17:53:23 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
MSSQL SP 3 On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, andrew2 () one net wrote:
Are you referring to Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 or MSSQL Service Pack 3? If MSSQL Service Pack 3, approximately when would you guesstimate the patch was installed? Andrew -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 2:21 PM To: 'nanog () merit edu' Subject: W32.SqlSlammer By the way, I know you guys probably don't care but McAfee is saying that if you have SP3 on your windows2000 server you will not be infected with SQLSlammer, this is absolutely NOT true, I have a box with sp3 and it IS infected. -Drew
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
Current thread:
- W32.SqlSlammer Drew Weaver (Jan 25)
- Re: W32.SqlSlammer K. Scott Bethke (Jan 25)
- Re: W32.SqlSlammer Dave Stewart (Jan 25)
- Re: W32.SqlSlammer Avleen Vig (Jan 25)
- Re: W32.SqlSlammer Simon Lockhart (Jan 25)
- RE: W32.SqlSlammer andrew2 (Jan 25)
- RE: W32.SqlSlammer Alex Rubenstein (Jan 25)
- Re: W32.SqlSlammer Charles Sprickman (Jan 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: W32.SqlSlammer Bender, Andrew (Jan 25)