nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP Whitelist (was Re: NOC contact for he.net)
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 20:23:58 -0500
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
That query configuration in SpamAssassin was incorrect, and has been fixed in 2.60. While I apologize that it caused you an inconvenience, it was in fact set up like that without our knowledge. It was querying the HIL even if there were no Habeas headers present in the inbound email in question, so it was querying the HIL for every single piece of email going through SA.
In other words, the HIL is designed to only counteract the Mark, and not operate as a bl(a|o)cklist. I've seen a lot of confusion concerning people's perceptions on that (read the iCop interview. haha).
-Jack
Current thread:
- NOC contact for he.net Roy (Jul 02)
- RE: NOC contact for he.net Todd Mitchell - lists (Jul 02)
- RE: NOC contact for he.net Mike Leber (Jul 02)
- Re: NOC contact for he.net Mike Leber (Jul 02)
- ISP Whitelist (was Re: NOC contact for he.net) Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Jul 03)
- Re: ISP Whitelist (was Re: NOC contact for he.net) Sean Donelan (Jul 03)
- Re: ISP Whitelist (was Re: NOC contact for he.net) Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Jul 03)
- Re: ISP Whitelist (was Re: NOC contact for he.net) Simon Lyall (Jul 03)
- Re: ISP Whitelist (was Re: NOC contact for he.net) Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Jul 03)
- Re: ISP Whitelist (was Re: NOC contact for he.net) Jack Bates (Jul 03)
- Re: ISP Whitelist (was Re: NOC contact for he.net) Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Jul 03)
- Re: ISP Whitelist (was Re: NOC contact for he.net) Sean Donelan (Jul 03)
- RE: NOC contact for he.net Todd Mitchell - lists (Jul 02)