nanog mailing list archives

Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions


From: "Petri Helenius" <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:23:50 +0300



I would say that because backdoored hosts are easily available in large
quantities, spoofing does not make sense and usually alarms various systems
more quickly than packets from legitimate addresses.

Pete

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <variable () ednet co uk>
To: "Rob Thomas" <robt () cymru com>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions



On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Rob Thomas wrote:

I've tracked 1787 DDoS attacks since 01 JAN 2003.  Of that number,
only 32 used spoofed sources.  I rarely see spoofed attacks now.

Do you have any ideas as to why that is?  Is it due to more providers 
doing source filtering?  It wouldn't make sense for attackers to become 
less sophisticated unless they became more difficult to catch for other 
reasons (e.g. botnets getting bigger).

Rich




Current thread: