nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fast TCP?
From: John Kristoff <jtk () aharp is-net depaul edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 05:19:23 -0500
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:41:22PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
causes far more severe problems. Since RED causes packet drops, high speed streams that get RED'd are in an immense world of pain. Further, since a
In some experience I've had RED did not cause drops. In fact, I have some data showing how drops increased without RED. <http://condor.depaul.edu/~jkristof/red/> I'd like to see (or actually perform them myself if I could :-) some actual tests. If anyone has any updated data doing AQM on high speed links or large streams, please post pointers. John
Current thread:
- Re: Fast TCP?, (continued)
- Re: Fast TCP? Allan Liska (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Deepak Jain (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Hank Nussbacher (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Rob Thomas (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Deepak Jain (Jun 05)
- Re: Fast TCP? Mans Nilsson (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? E.B. Dreger (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Scott Francis (Jun 05)
- Re: Fast TCP? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 05)
- Re: Fast TCP? Allan Liska (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? John Kristoff (Jun 05)