Re: FW: Minimum prefix length?

["Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>]

Whilst we're sidetracking...

I took some counsel on this not so long ago to see whether these were just 
novelty signatures or if they were real legal stuff. Turns out they could 
actually be used legally, interesting I thought.

Howevers its curious that signatures such as this claiming to be confidential 
are posted to a list which is very much public and archived in several public 
websites.. not sure how right it is to autoappend them to all your mails as well 
as the private ones!

Steve

On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Temkin, David wrote:

> Randy - please stop sending these to me - you send me one every time I post
> to NANOG.  If you don't like the signature that's appended to my emails (not
> by my choice), and the litigious society we live in,  go ahead and block all
> email from me.
>
> Replies directly to you to stop sending me these emails have gone
> unanswered, which is why I am mentioning this here.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:34 PM
> To: Temkin, David
> Subject: Re: Minimum prefix length?
>
>
> you have sent a message to me which seems to contain a legal warning on who
> can read it, or how it may be distributed, or whether it may be archived,
> etc.
>
> i do not accept such email, and have therefore deleted it.  do not expect
> further response.
>
> randy
>
>
> IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its
> attachments.  Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of
> this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly
> prohibited.  Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or
> should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or
> sell any security or other financial instrument.  Neither the sender, his or
> her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as
> to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein
> or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.