nanog mailing list archives
RE: IRR/RADB and BGP
From: Andy Dills <andy () xecu net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 22:20:37 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 jlewis () lewis org wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Andy Dills wrote:I dunno, there are plenty of smaller ASes who have yet to be forced to register their routes. We haven't yet been forced, but I finally got motivated to submit them to altdb last night. Altdb definitely rocks.Back when I got PI space in 1998, there were definitely some backbones ignoring routes not found in the IRR. I wonder if they gave up, or people just don't notice them anymore.
They must have either given up or had default routes, because we've been PI since 99, and I've never once had a BGP related reachability issue. Does anybody have any reasonable statistics for networks announced that don't fit an entry in the registry? Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 ---
Current thread:
- IRR/RADB and BGP Vandy Hamidi (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP jlewis (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Kevin Oberman (Jun 19)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Jake Khuon (Jun 19)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Deepak Jain (Jun 19)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Andy Dills (Jun 20)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Michael Hallgren (Jun 20)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP jlewis (Jun 22)
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Andy Dills (Jun 22)
- Re: IRR/RADB and BGP Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IRR/RADB and BGP Ejay Hire (Jun 20)