nanog mailing list archives
Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ...
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:58:29 -0500
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 04:37 PM, David G. Andersen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:09:51PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson quacked:On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:Production commercial networks need not apply, 'lest someone realize thatthey blow away these speed records on a regular basis.What kind of production environment needs a single TCP stream of data at 1 gigabit/s over a 150ms latency link?Just the fact that you need a ~20 megabyte TCP window size to achieve this(feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here) seems kind of unusal to me.It's unusual, but it's not completely unheard of. One of the biggest sources of such data is VLBI (interferometry to measure the movement of the earth's crust), in which signals from geographically distributed measurement sites have to be recorded and correlated at a central site: http://web.haystack.edu/vlbi/vlbisystems.html The signals are massive. Right now they use specially made tape drives that can record 1Gb/s: ftp://web.haystack.edu/pub/mark4/memos/230.2.pdf ftp://web.haystack.edu/pub/mark4/memos/HDR_concept.PDF and they send the data around via airplanes. They'd love to be able to do real-time correlation of the data, but that involves collecting 6 of these feeds at a central site (more coming). The feeds must be capable of running unattended for up to 24 hours (86 terabytes each, or an aggregate of half a petabyte per day).
VLBI is moving to hard drive replacements for the expensive 1 inch tapes currently used (known as Mark V). There are active projects for "e-VLBI" - at CRL in Japan
http://www.ntt.co.jp/news/news01e/0107/010706.html and at Haystack Observatory in Massachusetts http://web.haystack.edu/e-vlbi/meeting.htmlIn e-VLBI there is no need for reliable transmission and UDP is the way to go.
I am still involved with this peripherally, especially with the idea that the traffic be sent
"worse than best effort", so as not to collide with regular traffic.BTW, when I did VLBI for the Navy, we used to move literally tons of tapes around the world per month and achieved sustained bandwidths > 1 Gbps, albeit with FED-EX, not routers.
Yes, backbones push more than a gigabit across links, but not as for a single flow of data. -Dave -- work: dga () lcs mit edu me: dga () pobox comMIT Laboratory for Computer Science http://www.angio.net/I do not accept unsolicited commercial email. Do not spam me.
Regards Marshall Eubanks T.M. Eubanks Multicast Technologies, Inc. Phone : 703-293-9601 Fax : 703-293-9609 e-mail : tme () multicasttech com http://www.multicasttech.com Our New Multicast Workshop : http://www.multicasttech.com/workshop
Current thread:
- 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Eric Germann (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... David G. Andersen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... fingers (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Matt Zimmerman (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... E.B. Dreger (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Jason Slagle (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... alex (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Sean M . Doran (Mar 07)