nanog mailing list archives
RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..
From: Mark Segal <MSegal () FUTUREWAY CA>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:57:07 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: Haesu [mailto:haesu () towardex com] I totally agree with you. However, as always, centralized systems, while ease management and scalability, everything becomes a trust issue and a single point of failure or source of problems...
Single point of failure? Not sure I agree with you.. What happens if your sink hole disapears? Your filtering goes out.. O no.. Please not that. Hardley think that is even a reason for a noc to page you... :). Regards, Mark -- Mark Segal Director, Data Services Futureway Communications Inc. Tel: (905)326-1570
Current thread:
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.., (continued)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Joe Abley (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Barry Raveendran Greene (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Daniel Roesen (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Haesu (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Rob Thomas (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. James-lists (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Russell Heilling (Mar 10)