nanog mailing list archives
Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks)
From: Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell () martin fl us>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:21:39 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Adam Rothschild wrote:
On 2003-03-11-21:01:00, JC Dill <nanog () vo cnchost com> wrote:failure will lead to the broken networks being fixed and clue being distributed.How do I configure my routers and web servers for that?
no ip clue-inhibit ip bgp redistribute-clue
Current thread:
- Re: 69/8...this sucks, (continued)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Charles Sprickman (Mar 11)
- Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) wireworks (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Adam Rothschild (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Greg Maxwell (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Mar 12)
- gender and nanog Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- RE: route filtering in large networks Michael K. Smith (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Rob Thomas (Mar 12)