nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route Supression Problem
From: Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:27:06 -0700
Dampening is done on the eBGP router where the route enters the AS, and, unless I'm mistaken, per route/path and not per prefix. So the flapping that ISP A sees from ISP B is a completely seperate thing from the flapping that ISP A sees from its customer's customer as far as the dampening algorithm is concerned.
Nope. It's per-prefix. Have a look at the pointer Randy provided. I think one of the section of RFC 2439 alludes to this as well. -danny
Current thread:
- Re: Route Supression Problem, (continued)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Vadim Antonov (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Adam Rothschild (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Jack Bates (Mar 12)