nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamcop.net?
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () fugawi net>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 23:43:56 -0500
Not for nothing, but there's so much time wasted with all these diversified spam systems. I've been reading about Barry Shein's proposals and I have to say I am on board with a centralized -single- system based on his young, but intelligent, model. http://www.internetweek.com/breakingNews/INW20021219S0003I applaud RBL, spamcop, etc., but without funding and consolidation, it's another
waste of offensive time that could be spent on a far more effective defense. -M At 02:51 AM 3/4/2003 +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, blitz wrote: >> Anyone having trouble getting to/ know of any issues with spamcop.net today?> > They seemed to have dropped off the radar from me... > > No pings > No traceroute > > but they still show registered at 216.127.43.89 > laptop ~]$ t 216.127.43.89 80 Trying 216.127.43.89... Connected to 216.127.43.89 (216.127.43.89). Escape character is '^]'. GET / hmm, there isnt anything returning right now, but it connects atleast :) > Tnx > > Marc > macronet.net >
Regards, -- Martin Hannigan hannigan () fugawi net
Current thread:
- spamcop.net? blitz (Mar 03)
- Re: spamcop.net? Will Yardley (Mar 03)
- Re: spamcop.net? Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 03)
- Message not available
- Re: spamcop.net? Martin Hannigan (Mar 03)
- Re: spamcop.net? Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 03)
- Re: spamcop.net? Stephen Sprunk (Mar 04)
- Re: spamcop.net? blitz (Mar 04)
- Re: spamcop.net? chuck goolsbee (Mar 04)
- Re: spamcop.net? Paul Vixie (Mar 04)
- Re: spamcop.net? Martin Hannigan (Mar 03)
- Message not available
- RE: spamcop.net? blitz (Mar 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: spamcop.net? Peter Salus (Mar 04)