nanog mailing list archives
RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True)
From: "Kris Foster" <Kris.Foster () telus com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:04:36 -0700
I think that we possibly may need three subgroups. But maybe not all at once.
why don't we just get it over with and break apart/dilute into the usual suspect: social, technological, legal, economic, political. [sarcasm] Kris
Current thread:
- NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jack Bates (Mar 30)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 30)
- Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jared Mauch (Mar 30)
- Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 30)
- Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jack Bates (Mar 30)
- Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Nathan J. Mehl (Mar 31)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 30)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Krzysztof Adamski (Mar 30)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 31)
- Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jared Mauch (Mar 30)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) McBurnett, Jim (Mar 30)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Kris Foster (Mar 31)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 31)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 31)