nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Lee Howard <lee.howard () mci com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 18:07:53 -0400 (EDT)
We're here, name differences notwithstanding. We do counsel our customers to set no-export on their more-specifics, and we're happy to show them how or set it up for them. When I see customers on the CIDR report, I make sure they get a phone call to explain why aggregation is good and how we can help. Lee On Fri, 9 May 2003, Larry J. Blunk wrote:
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 11:19:21 -0400 From: Larry J. Blunk <ljb () merit edu> To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: The Cidr Report Hmm, The USDA seems to be very active of late. CIDR Police (and UUnet) where are you?ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain DescriptionFeb 07AS4151 345 71 274 79.4% USDA-1 USDAMarch 14AS4151 535 109 426 79.6% USDA-1 USDAApril 11AS4151 691 75 616 89.1% USDA-1 USDAMay 09AS4151 1083 77 1006 92.9% USDA-1 USDASBC also seems to be moving up rapidly from out of nowhere.ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain DescriptionApril 11AS7132 802 414 388 48.4% SBIS-AS SBC Internet ServicesMay 09AS7132 963 208 755 78.4% SBIS-AS SBC Internet Services
Current thread:
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (May 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (May 09)
- Re: The Cidr Report Larry J. Blunk (May 09)
- Re: The Cidr Report ren (May 09)
- Re: The Cidr Report Lee Howard (May 09)
- Re: The Cidr Report Hank Nussbacher (May 10)
- Re: The Cidr Report Larry J. Blunk (May 09)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (May 16)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (May 23)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (May 30)