nanog mailing list archives

Re: identity theft != spam

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 19:38:27 +0200

Maybe, JUST maybe this case will deter other spammers - but I doubt it!


at best it will deter other header forgers.  while it is true that this
is good, i predict that in 3-5 years, the level of spam will be the
same, but it will all come from the corporates with un-forged headers.
look in your post box.  listen to the radio.  watch television in the
states.

randy

Current thread:

identity theft != spam Randy Bush (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam Richard Welty (May 15)
  - Re[2]: identity theft != spam Richard Welty (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Randy Bush (May 15)
    - Re: identity theft != spam Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam John Payne (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Daniel Golding (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam Chris Horry (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Randy Bush (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam Chris Woodfield (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Charles Sprickman (May 15)
    - Re: identity theft != spam Vadim Antonov (May 15)
    - Re: identity theft != spam Peter Galbavy (May 16)
    - Re: identity theft != spam steve uurtamo (May 16)
- Re: identity theft != spam Bill Woodcock (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Bill Woodcock (May 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: identity theft != spam Steven M. Bellovin (May 15)