nanog mailing list archives

Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering]


From: Daniel Golding <dgold () FDFNet Net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 14:13:56 -0500 (CDT)


To take a crack at it...

- Route origin - customer, peer, transit provider, other (dial, etc)
- Route geography - depends on your network, but some have seperate
communities for POP, Country, Region, etc
- Customer originated information - tweaks by your customers to
selectively prepend, change local pref, not send to peers, or what not
- Source AS - simply your AS:peer AS that the route was learned from

There was an Internet Draft, last year, that summarized some of the
approachs. I suspect overspecificity in this case has never done any harm,
while lack of specificity has probably caused some heartache.

- Daniel Golding

On Fri, 16 May 2003, Deepak Jain wrote:


I like using BGP communities:
   o  filter announcements you receive from downstreams based on your
      criteria of choice
   o  set a specific BGP community (yourAS:whatever) on
announcements which
      are to be propagated to various places (upstream providers, etc.)
   o  do output filtering based on the communities you set
Make sure you clear yourAS:whatever in announcements from your BGP peers.

You can use this same technique for prefixes you originate, so
that all your
outbound BGP filtering is based on communities.

I am hijacking this thread a bit. Setting communities is excellent advice
especially if you are just starting out with downstream ASes.

The question is that changing your communities down the road might be a big
headache depending on whether you'll come to need  more advanced ways of
filtering your announcements than coarse communities allow. Especially when
going (through growth or acquisition) from a single metro network to a
multi-metro or national/international one.

What criteria does the community think should be used when specifying
communities. IMO, overspecificity [sp?] doesn't hurt, but others may (and
have) disagreed. What's the BCP?

Thanks,

Deepak Jain
AINET




Current thread: