nanog mailing list archives
Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes
From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Stephen Sprunk wrote:Thus spake "Dan Hollis" <goemon () anime net>On Thu, 29 May 2003, Jack Bates wrote:Dan Hollis wrote:ok, what UPSes do telcos use (besides their monster battery arrays)What's wrong with our monster battery arrays?They dont tend to fit in 19" rackmountsYou wouldn't mount a "monster array" in 19" racks anyways.Yes, I was specifically asking what telcos use when they dont use the battery arrays. Eg what do they use in remote cabinets or customer premise sites... I thought it was a simple question, guess not.
for most sites I've seen, the 19" rack is too small for the monster array. they tend to use 23" racks and place the batts at the bottom - generally 3-6 hour runtime. --bill
Current thread:
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC), (continued)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Sean Donelan (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) E.B. Dreger (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Kevin Day (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Dan Hollis (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Jack Bates (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Dan Hollis (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Stephen Sprunk (May 29)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Dan Hollis (May 30)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Joel Jaeggli (May 30)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Dan Hollis (May 30)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes bmanning (May 30)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes Jack Bates (May 30)
- Re: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) David Lesher (May 29)
- Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Gerald (May 29)