nanog mailing list archives
Re: How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized?
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 08:20:34 -0400
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 02:27:08AM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
I know I'm going to regret this, and I'm not debating that this particular network block was hijacked, but I do have a couple of questions.
[snip] Probably the only real answers sounds sarcastic: - There's continuity in the announcements that don't make it appear suspect - Paul/the ISC is a smart hijacker, responsive to concerns/compaints and not the source of them. -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: The in-your-face hijacking example, was: Re: Who is announcing bogons? Jon Mitchell (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The in-your-face hijacking example, was: Re: Who is announcing bogons? Kai Schlichting (May 01)
- How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized? Sean Donelan (May 01)
- Re: How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized? brett watson (May 01)
- Re: How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized? Richard A Steenbergen (May 02)
- Re: How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized? Paul Vixie (May 02)
- Re: How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized? John Palmer (May 02)
- Re: How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized? Chris Kilbourn (May 03)
- How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized? Sean Donelan (May 01)
- Re: How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized? Joe Provo (May 03)