nanog mailing list archives
Re: Portscans/PROXY scans
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh () outblaze com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 17:36:53 -0500
Sean Donelan writes on 11/1/2003 5:23 PM:
Its your network (or maybe your employer's network) to do whatever you choose. You may want to consider blocking smaller ranges than the entire /8.
Or go the opposite extreme and nullroute 0/0.Portscans on the internet are a fact of life - unpleasant, yes, but you can safely ignore them, and instead, concentrate on keeping your systems secured.
-- srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9 manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations
Current thread:
- Portscans/PROXY scans John_York (Nov 01)
- Re: Portscans/PROXY scans Sean Donelan (Nov 01)
- Re: Portscans/PROXY scans Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 01)
- Re: Portscans/PROXY scans Paul Vixie (Nov 01)
- Re: Portscans/PROXY scans Andrew D Kirch (Nov 02)
- Re: Portscans/PROXY scans Matthew Sullivan (Nov 02)
- Re: Portscans/PROXY scans Paul Vixie (Nov 02)
- The Internet's Immune System Christopher X. Candreva (Nov 12)
- Re: The Internet's Immune System David A. Ulevitch (Nov 12)
- Re: The Internet's Immune System Christopher X. Candreva (Nov 12)
- Re: Portscans/PROXY scans Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 01)
- Re: The Internet's Immune System Bryan Bradsby (Nov 12)
- Re: Portscans/PROXY scans Sean Donelan (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Portscans/PROXY scans John_York (Nov 01)