nanog mailing list archives
Re: law enforcement contacts
From: Dave Stewart <dbs () dbscom com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:23:45 -0500
At 02:13 AM 11/11/2003, J. Oquendo wrote:
Uhm... Correct me if I missed something, but LEO's get paid to uphold the law BY ACTING on crime in their expertise and if it's out of their range (juridstiction) an `LEO` should have better contacts than someone on the outside.
Perhaps they will have contacts, but c'mon... how many of 'em do you really believe care?
Basically, if it isn't child porn/sexual abuse, most law enforcement agencies have bigger fish to fry... or at least, think they do. They don't care to get involved in a problem that could potentially involve multiple jurisdictions... it's just too much hassle, and they have plenty going on locally.
I *have* had encouraging results from the local folk, but that's the exception rather than the rule
Current thread:
- law enforcement contacts Alex Yuriev (Nov 10)
- Re: law enforcement contacts JC Dill (Nov 10)
- Re: law enforcement contacts Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: law enforcement contacts J. Oquendo (Nov 10)
- Re: law enforcement contacts Dave Stewart (Nov 10)
- Re: law enforcement contacts JC Dill (Nov 11)
- Re: law enforcement contacts Dave Stewart (Nov 10)
- Re: law enforcement contacts JC Dill (Nov 10)