nanog mailing list archives
Re: TAT 14 failure
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:18:10 -0500
In message <20031125185227.78491.qmail () web41106 mail yahoo com>, Jack McCarthy writes:
I saw that link when I googled for TAT-14. I was looking more for a "see, I told you so" link that I can forward to management that provides proof that this is why our UK office is down...if you know what I mean. Here's an interesting explanation of undersea cabling: http://davidw.home.cern.ch/davidw/public/SubCables.html
And don't forget Neal Stephenson's wonderful perspective on the subject in Wired: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/ffglass.html --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- TAT 14 failure jmalcolm (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jack McCarthy (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jared Mauch (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jack McCarthy (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jared Mauch (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jack McCarthy (Nov 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TAT 14 failure garrett . allen (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure garrett . allen (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Leo Bicknell (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jack McCarthy (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure David Lesher (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Simon Lockhart (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Vincent Gillet (Nov 26)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Leo Bicknell (Nov 25)