nanog mailing list archives
Re: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...)
From: Steve Gibbard <scg () gibbard org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:08:56 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: [Regarding somebody's registration of nanog.us]
I can't tell you who to talk to over at NS, but since you all have latest bind, and are cluefull on the VGRS wildcard hack, you all can limit the effect that the "nanog" has in the .us root zone.
Uh... This appears to be a potential trademark law issue, except that I'm not aware of Merit or anybody else ever claiming NANOG as a trademark. Presumably, if this becomes a problem (somebody advertising alternate "NANOG" conferences, for example), Merit's lawyers can deal with it. This certainly isn't an operational issue, unless the word NANOG, independent of context, is somehow of critical operational importance. I suppose this is the slippery slope that's opened up when people start blocking wildcards they don't like in their individual DNS servers, but as one of those who was concerned about the effect on DNS consistency that would have, I shudder to think what would happen if individual DNS operators started doing trademark enforcement. -Steve
Current thread:
- RE: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...) Michel Py (Nov 02)
- RE: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...) Scott Call (Nov 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...) Michel Py (Nov 03)
- Re: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Nov 03)
- Re: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...) Steve Gibbard (Nov 03)
- Re: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Nov 03)
- Re: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 03)
- Re: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Nov 03)
- RE: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...) Michel Py (Nov 03)
- RE: Harassment (was Re: ELAN.NET ...) Jeffrey Wheat (Nov 04)