nanog mailing list archives
Re: NOAA warning for rf communications
From: ed () the7thbeer com
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 05:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
"High frequency communications"? We *are* talking about multi-GHz frequencies here.
HF is generally taken to mean 30Mhz and lower, at least in radio circles. Ghz I think is in the SHF range. -ed ----------------- ed () the7thbeer com
Current thread:
- NOAA warning for rf communications Rodney Joffe (Oct 23)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Tomas Lund (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Robert Mathews (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Bob Snyder (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Kevin Loch (Oct 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Chris Yarnell (Oct 23)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Roy (Oct 23)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Todd Vierling (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications ed (Oct 24)
- RE: NOAA warning for rf communications Kevin Bednar (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Owen DeLong (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Rodney Joffe (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Anton L. Kapela (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Roy (Oct 23)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq. (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Marshall Eubanks (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Eric Kuhnke (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Todd Vierling (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Scott Granados (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Owen DeLong (Oct 26)