nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISPs' willingness to take action
From: "Paul G" <paul () rusko us>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 20:13:30 -0500
ken,
---snip--- 3) There was a thread a little while ago that talked about a way to cut down spam by simply restricting who you would accept SMTP traffic from. Unfortunately, I don't recall the details, but at the time it struck me as eminently sensible, and just required cooperation between ISPs to
implement
effectively. ---snip---
so what you are saying is that you would like to go back to the fidonet days, when site A had to agree to route site B's mail? a deny all, accept some rule for smtp would horribly break all that is good in humanity. am i missing something here? paul
Current thread:
- ISPs' willingness to take action kenw (Oct 26)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Paul G (Oct 26)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Terry Baranski (Oct 26)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Christopher X. Candreva (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Brian Bruns (Oct 26)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Eric Kuhnke (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Alan Spicer (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Sean Donelan (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Joe Abley (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Sean Donelan (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action kenw (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Sean Donelan (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Joe Abley (Oct 27)
(Thread continues...)