Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd)

["Dave Howe" <DaveHowe () gmx co uk>]

Avleen Vig wrote:
> If "more IP addresses" is the only motivation for using IPv6, it's
> really not enough. For environments where direct access to the
> internet isn't required, NAT serves perfectly well.
IPSec, SIP/VoIP or almost anything that relies on UDP borks on NAT,
doesn't it?