nanog mailing list archives
Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects?
From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 08:29:45AM -0700, bmanning () karoshi com wrote:zone "com" { type delegation-only; }; zone "net" { type delegation-only; };well, thats up to the zone admin. :)Everything is. :)
glad you agree.
my concern is mostly along the lines of folks who will do things like: zone "waw.pl" { type delegation-only; }; to random zones that they think -SHOULD- be delegation-only, regardless of what the zone admin specifies.So you are questioning the "type delegation-only" functionality? Then it's a wrong address, stupidity will always be the biggest problem in the universe.
in a word, YES. and there have been/are lots of folks who fall into the trap of either "stupidity" or ignorance (more likely) who will do things simply because is was in some script or manual w/o questioning -why-. These types of folks can be reasoned with, its just that there are so many of them... :) More worrysome are those who are disgruntled or are malicious and will code things up to be disruptive by choice. while BIND is open-source and any knuckledragging code jock can "haq the source" to do this, ISC is acting as arm manufacture and dealer, handing out easy to use code that allows local admins to lie to themselves and those that use their servers about what the zone admin indicates is correct for the zone. (and yes, I have a bias here... :)
However, Verisign hijacking "com" and "net" made few things clear. Most important: these domains are public, not theirs, hence they should not
that is not clear to me. I'd like to argue that -ALL- delegations are made in the public interest and are not "owned" by anyone. You and others are trying to claim that some delegations are "public" and some are not. I'd really like to see the legal basis for making such a distinction.
do arbitrary changes to them. Marking "com" and "net" as delegation-only is not harming anything. (At least until ICANN changes its mind.)
perhaps not. I remain unconvinced.
p. -- Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -- Commissioner Pravin Lal http://nerdquiz.sgh.waw.pl/ -- polska wersja quizu dla nerdów ;)
Current thread:
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects?, (continued)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Mike Batchelor (Oct 03)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? bmanning (Oct 03)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Piotr KUCHARSKI (Oct 04)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Rob Payne (Oct 04)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Piotr KUCHARSKI (Oct 04)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? bmanning (Oct 04)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Paul Vixie (Oct 04)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Piotr KUCHARSKI (Oct 04)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Paul Vixie (Oct 04)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Piotr KUCHARSKI (Oct 04)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? bmanning (Oct 04)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Piotr KUCHARSKI (Oct 04)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Niels Bakker (Oct 05)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Joel Rowbottom (Oct 06)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Piotr KUCHARSKI (Oct 06)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Joel Rowbottom (Oct 06)
- Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects? Niels Bakker (Oct 06)