nanog mailing list archives
Re: Extreme BlackDiamond
From: jlewis () lewis org
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:28:42 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Is it just me, or could nanog really benefit from being moderated, or at least nanog-post being access controlled? God knows why I've kept skimming it even after the majority of actual clueful network operators have long
Are you volunteering to be the moderator? Moderation is alot of work, and/or would slow the list down to a crawl. Perhaps limiting who can post would be somewhat useful though. Perhaps only people actually operating "real networks", where "real networks" are somehow defined by their size or their participation in BGP.
Current thread:
- RE: Extreme BlackDiamond, (continued)
- RE: Extreme BlackDiamond Shazad - eServers (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond Haesu (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond Mans Nilsson (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond Pekka Savola (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond Jared Mauch (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond sthaug (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 13)
- RE: Extreme BlackDiamond alex (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond jlewis (Oct 13)
- RE: Extreme BlackDiamond Shazad - eServers (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond Matthew S. Hallacy (Oct 13)
- RE: Extreme BlackDiamond Vivien M. (Oct 13)
- RE: Extreme BlackDiamond Shazad - eServers (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond Mark Boolootian (Oct 13)
- Re: Extreme BlackDiamond matt (Oct 13)
- RE: Extreme BlackDiamond sthaug (Oct 13)