nanog mailing list archives
RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone?
From: Paul Timmins <paul () timmins net>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 01:29:08 -0400
Agreed. I know nothing about the pricing but last time I had a problem with BGP, it only took a few minutes to get someone with enable and clue, calling their general support number posted on their website. The problem was on their end and it was fixed while I was on the phone. Arguably one of the fastest response times I've ever had with a vendor. -Paul On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:40, Daniel Golding wrote:
Level(3) is generally very good. Great engineering team and very reliable. I'm not sure if their pricing will maintain their business model in the long run, but I certainly hope so. - Daniel Golding On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Sean Crandall wrote:One of the providers we are looking at is Level-3. Any comments good/bad on reliability and clue? We already have UU, Sprint, and AT&T. I also realize that the "they suck less" list changes continuously... :)I have about 5 GB of IP transit connections from Level3 across 8 markets (plus using their facilities for our backbone). Level3 has been very solid on the IP transit side. MFN/AboveNet has also been very good to us. -Sean Sean P. Crandall VP Engineering Operations MegaPath Networks Inc. 6691 Owens Drive Pleasanton, CA 94588 (925) 201-2530 (office) (925) 201-2550 (fax)
-- Paul Timmins <paul () timmins net>
Current thread:
- RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Paul Timmins (Aug 31)