nanog mailing list archives

Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal


From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 03:28:57 -0400


On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 11:23:04PM -0700, Henry Linneweh wrote:
My view would concur with this, these are really old battles starting back in the 
netsol days and now the verisign has taken the same short sighted path.
 
It is time that neutral party is in charge
-Henry R Linneweh

        I was thinking this earlier this week.

        This is a public-trust that should be operated by people
whose sole job is to keep it up and working, not by a dual-role
entity as it is today.

        Perhaps we can get someone to make a not-for-profit
for this sole role.

        - Jared

Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com> wrote:

ICANN can seek specific performance of the agreement by Verisign, or
seek to terminate Verisign's contract as the .COM/.NET registry operator
and transfer the operation to a successor registry.

Quiet honestly I'd like to see all of the GTLD servers given to neutral
companies, ones that ARE not registrars. [...]

frankly i am mystified as to why icann awards registry contracts to
for-profit entities. registrars can be for-profit, but registries should
be non-profit or public-trust or whatever that specific nation's laws allow
for in terms of requirements for open accounting, uniform dealing, and
nonconflict with the public's interest.
-- 
Paul Vixie
-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.


Current thread: