nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign Responds
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 24 Sep 2003 18:15:43 +0000
oh... that wasn't a joke, then? there won't be a protocol change of that kind, not in a million years.It doesn't have to be a protocol change. Strictly an implementation change.
you are confused. and in any case this is off-topic. take it to namedroppers, but before you do, please read rfc's 1033, 1034, 1035, 2136, 2181, and 2317. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign Responds, (continued)
- Re: Verisign Responds Randy Bush (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Eliot Lear (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dave Crocker (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jim Segrave (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Eliot Lear (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Wayne E. Bouchard (Sep 24)