nanog mailing list archives
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior
From: "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <grisha () ispol com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:03:11 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, George William Herbert wrote:
Did it occur to Verisign that perhaps this needed some external policy and technical review before you just went ahead and did this?
I wouldn't be surprised if the real motivation is to get the attention of (at least the US) government and to set a precedent for regulating DNS, which will probably be to Verisign's advantage. Grisha
Current thread:
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior, (continued)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Joe Maimon (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior wayne (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Duane Wessels (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Hank Nussbacher (Sep 16)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Sep 16)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Neil J. McRae (Sep 16)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior George William Herbert (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Simon Lyall (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Dr. Jeffrey Race (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior dani-nanog (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior George William Herbert (Sep 16)