nanog mailing list archives
RE: On the back of other 'security' posts....
From: "Terry Baranski" <tbaranski () mail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 14:58:02 -0400
the rest of the paper is also germane to this thread. just fya, we keep rehashing the UNimportant part of this argument, and never progressing. (from this, i deduce that we must be humans.)
Ok, so we seem to have a general agreement that anti-spoof & BGP prefix filtering on all standard customer edge links is a worthwhile practice. Now what? Is there any hope of this ever happening on a very large scale without somehow being mandated? (Not that it necessarily should be mandated.) How much success have Barry Green and co. had? Is there something the rest of us could be doing?
Current thread:
- RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Terry Baranski (Sep 01)
- RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Daniel Senie (Sep 01)
- Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Paul Vixie (Sep 01)
- Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Scott Francis (Sep 03)