nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP telephony
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:41:46 +0300
Christopher Bird wrote:
IP telephony works alright if you take the neccessary precautions for performance management, monitoring, rate-limiting unwanted traffic, etc. which you should do anyway. Most organisations have gotten along and are acting in reactive modeDoes anyone here have any thoughts, experiences, etc. about the use of IP telephony in corporate environments?
whenever new "threats" are "discovered". Most problems with IP telephony come from the "router people" not talkingto the "firewall people" and both of them not talking to the "telephone people".
If you can get those lines working, you´ll likely to succeed. If you don´t, go with the traditional way, because then you don´t have to make the people communicate. Pete
Current thread:
- IP telephony Christopher Bird (Sep 16)
- Re: IP telephony Henry Linneweh (Sep 16)
- Re: IP telephony Petri Helenius (Sep 17)
- Re: IP telephony Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 17)
- RE: IP telephony - Thank you all for insights and answers - no new content in message, but I wanted to acknowledge all who took the time! Christopher Bird (Sep 17)