nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:52:29 +0200
On 15-apr-04, at 2:45, Paul Vixie wrote:
preventing DDoS and IP source address forgery each also break what the IAB calls "the end-to-end model".
How so?
(dunno if you heard, but in spite of 128 bits ofaddress space, the enterprise user community is now asking for IPv6 NAT.)
I hadn't, pointer please?
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT), (continued)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Jeff Shultz, WIllamette Valley Internet (Apr 19)
- RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Geo. (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Alexei Roudnev (Apr 19)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Paul Vixie (Apr 19)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Sean Donelan (Apr 19)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Matt Hess (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Alexei Roudnev (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joel Jaeggli (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators Pekka Savola (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Niels Bakker (Apr 16)