nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators - NOT
From: Lou Katz <lou () metron com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 11:33:25 -0700
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 02:01:45PM -0400, Jerry Eyers wrote:
Spamming is pervasive mainly due to the inattention or failure to enforce acceptable use policies by the service provider.I must point out that this statement is just flat wrong. Spamming exists because spamming works. Why do spammers send out millions of emails? Because thousands of people click, look at, and subscribe to services and products being spewed by the spammers. If spamming didn't sell products, spamming would die off. We must educate the users to not do anything with spam but delete it. As from the sucess of infomercials on television shows, that won't happen anytime soon.
I think you are 'right on'. I offer this observation, first triggered by a third-hand report from some sociologists: A while back, I was getting frequent spams for breast enlargement and the like, along with some penis-related products. The breast related spam has totally vanished today, but viagra/penis spam is arriving continuously. The sociologist had noted that some societal trends and indicators could be read by looking at what is being offered. Apparently the market for breast-related products in the world of spam-receivers just wasn't there, so spamming for breasts seems to have ceased.
Jerry
-- -=[L]=-
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Paul Jakma (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Mike Jezierski - BOFH (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Matt Hess (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Mike Jezierski - BOFH (Apr 18)
- Blocking Win95 hosts [WAS: Lazy network operators - NOT] Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 18)
- Re: Blocking Win95 hosts [WAS: Lazy network operators - NOT] Matt Hess (Apr 18)
- Fingerprints (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Sean Donelan (Apr 19)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Petri Helenius (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Paul Vixie (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Jerry Eyers (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Lou Katz (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Rodney Joffe (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Doug White (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Sean Donelan (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Doug White (Apr 18)
- Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Sean Donelan (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Brandon Shiers (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Petri Helenius (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Henry Yen (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Peter Galbavy (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Michael Painter (Apr 19)