nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mail with no purpose?
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 14:17:54 +0200
On 1-apr-04, at 18:49, Michel Py wrote:
In other words: if you're already to the point where you are using a text-mode mail client or disabling HTML and/or other stuff in a GUIclient, you are no loss to the spammer if your email does not confirm asvalid (because you would not even read it nor buy any of their crud in the first place).
So what you're saying is that these validation schemes are a good thing?
Current thread:
- RE: Mail with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Mail with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 02)