nanog mailing list archives
RE: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST)
From: "Blaine Christian" <blaine.christian () mci com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:06:17 -0400
Can I use secondary IP addresses and then BGP with these addresses, this would be a form of "security by obscurity" but providing you can keep the info a secret thats surely going to do it?
It will depend on your architecture in large part. In some cases there is absolutely no need to route the prefixes that you use for your BGP sessions beyond the devices doing BGP. This can reduce your exposure to MD5 related cpu churn etc...
Current thread:
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit, (continued)
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Daniel Golding (Apr 20)
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
- TCP Vulnerability makes case for authenticated BGP tad pedley (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP Vulnerability makes case for authenticated BGP Pekka Savola (Apr 20)
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 20)
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
- IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) Blaine Christian (Apr 20)
- Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 22)
- Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) Niels Bakker (Apr 22)
- Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 22)
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Daniel Golding (Apr 20)
- RE: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) Blaine Christian (Apr 22)
- RE: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 22)
- Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 22)
- Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) E.B. Dreger (Apr 22)
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Alexei Roudnev (Apr 21)
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Daniel Golding (Apr 20)
- Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit Daniel Golding (Apr 20)