nanog mailing list archives
Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:33:37 +0100 (BST)
I'd prefer a PGP signed message, but I know that the people who use S/MIME would probably object.
It doesn't matter what the email is signed with I'd still go to the site to confirm
It would be too easy to get many people to pull an entry from a filter with a forged message and have the space used "improperly".
There's easier space to steal though they may like the challenge of doing it in your face. Better to trust that Rob Thomas has done due diligence than rely on email a virus may have generated (signed or not) brandon
Current thread:
- New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC Steve Conte (Apr 28)
- Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC Kevin Oberman (Apr 28)
- Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC Pekka Savola (Apr 28)
- Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC Kevin Oberman (Apr 28)
- Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC Pekka Savola (Apr 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC Brandon Butterworth (Apr 28)
- Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC Pekka Savola (Apr 28)
- RE: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC Michel Py (Apr 28)
- Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC Kevin Oberman (Apr 28)