nanog mailing list archives
Re: 16-bit ASN kludge
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 18:08:33 -0500
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:36:39 CST, John Dupuy said:
Along these lines, one could leave the transit AS networks alone if a parallel 16 bit ASN space were created. Essentially, any non-transit network would have it's non-public ASN retranslated NAT-style by upstream transit network border routers. Only the border routers would have to be changed. They would have to differentiate between public ASN X and non-public ASN X (same number) based on the which side of the router the ASN was learned from.
So given the lack of trouble with NAT sites leaking rfc1918 addresses, you foresee no problems with sites accidentally leaking the non-public ASN's, right?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge, (continued)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Edward B. Dreger (Dec 03)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Owen DeLong (Dec 03)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Edward B. Dreger (Dec 03)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Owen DeLong (Dec 04)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 04)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Edward B. Dreger (Dec 04)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 05)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Owen DeLong (Dec 05)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Edward B. Dreger (Dec 05)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Andrew - Supernews (Dec 04)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 03)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Owen DeLong (Dec 03)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 06)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Owen DeLong (Dec 06)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 06)
- Re: 16-bit ASN kludge Owen DeLong (Dec 06)