nanog mailing list archives
Re: Halo 2 and broadband traffic
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:16:22 +0200
Bob Snyder wrote:
And oddly enough, Sandvine offers a box that does this! :-) They're jumping on the press coverage of Halo 2 to try and raise awareness of their product line. Not that what's being said doesn't have merit, but it's definately a PR push, and definately not a "End of the net predicted, film at 11" moment.
To quote Daniel Golding from a few months ago, one of my favourite ones:
It has become trendy, in some circles, to lament the Internet's poor performance/congestion/non-deterministic nature/lack of security/<insert issue here>. After firmly denouncing the Internet, the company or individual then touts their product, which will fix/replace/augment the Internet.
It's somewhat longer road without making the tabloid headlines, but I'd be happy to introduce interested parties to solutions we feel are elegant and seamlessly fit operational practises of ISPs.
Pete
Current thread:
- Halo 2 and broadband traffic Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Dec 08)
- Re: Halo 2 and broadband traffic Eric Gauthier (Dec 08)
- RE: Halo 2 and broadband traffic Neil J. McRae (Dec 08)
- RE: Halo 2 and broadband traffic Tom Easterday (Dec 08)
- Re: Halo 2 and broadband traffic Eric Gauthier (Dec 08)
- RE: Halo 2 and broadband traffic Neil J. McRae (Dec 08)
- Re: Halo 2 and broadband traffic Bob Snyder (Dec 08)
- Re: Halo 2 and broadband traffic Petri Helenius (Dec 12)
- Re: Halo 2 and broadband traffic Robert M. Enger (Dec 08)
- Re: Halo 2 and broadband traffic Eric Gauthier (Dec 08)