nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast 101
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:39:24 +0200
Paul Vixie wrote:
Since when bad engineering is bad to the big business? The world is full of examples to the contrary.of course it will work. it just won't be particularly fast. specifically, it won't allow tcp to discover the actual end-to-end bandwidth*delay product, and therefore tcp won't set its window size advantageously, and some or all of the links along the path won't run at capacity. packet reordering is not fatal to the technology, but it is fatal to the business. "not everything that can be done, should be done."
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast 101, (continued)
- Re: Anycast 101 William Allen Simpson (Dec 17)
- Re: Anycast 101 Paul Vixie (Dec 18)
- Re: Anycast 101 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 20)
- Re: Anycast 101 Stephane Bortzmeyer (Dec 20)
- Re: Anycast 101 Paul Vixie (Dec 20)
- Re: Anycast 101 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Anycast 101 Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 21)
- Re: Anycast 101 Joe Shen (Dec 20)
- Re: Anycast 101 bmanning (Dec 20)
- Re: Anycast 101 Paul Vixie (Dec 20)
- Re: Anycast 101 Petri Helenius (Dec 20)
- Re: Anycast 101 Paul Vixie (Dec 20)
- Re: Anycast 101 Richard Irving (Dec 17)
- Re: Anycast 101 vijay gill (Dec 17)
- Re: Anycast 101 Richard Irving (Dec 17)
- Re: Anycast 101 bmanning (Dec 20)
- Re: Anycast 101 Paul Vixie (Dec 20)
- Re: Anycast 101 bmanning (Dec 20)