nanog mailing list archives
Re: Smallest Transit MTU
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:53:24 -0500
On 29 Dec 2004, at 18:39, Alex Bligh wrote:
--On 29 December 2004 17:04 -0500 Joe Abley <jabley () isc org> wrote:But that only affects tcp traffic - it does nothing to help other protocols.Are there any common examples of the DF bit being set on non-TCP packets?traceroute
Ah, but that's only production traffic if your name is CAIDA :-) Joe
Current thread:
- Smallest Transit MTU Jerry Pasker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Fred Baker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Jerry Pasker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Fred Baker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Tony Rall (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Daniel Hagerty (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Alex Bligh (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Tony Rall (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Edward B. Dreger (Dec 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Dan Hollis (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)