nanog mailing list archives
RE: Smallest Transit MTU
From: Scott Weeks <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:41:41 -1000 (HST)
: I, for one, do not agree. End hosts and firewalls *should* reject all : traffic they don't understand. It's precisely to prevent our unintentional It depends on weather you're a site or transit provider. If you're a site, you can do this. If you're transit, that's what you get paid for. To transport all packets. Old argument. See the archives. scott
Current thread:
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU, (continued)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Dan Hollis (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Dan Hollis (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU John Kristoff (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 31)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU Scott Weeks (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU Matthew Kaufman (Dec 30)
- RE: Smallest Transit MTU David Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 30)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 31)