nanog mailing list archives
Re: question on ptr rr
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 00:26:55 -0500
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 21:10:50 PST, Lou Katz <lou () metron com> said:
The side effect of this are truly chilling - no more peer-to-peer, and private conversations are now the property of others.
Phil Zimmerman has a solution for the second part there. The loss of peer-to-peer is however a bit harder to work around.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: question on ptr rr, (continued)
- Re: question on ptr rr Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 07)
- Re: question on ptr rr Sean Donelan (Feb 07)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Andrew - Supernews (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr garrett.allen (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Chris Adams (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Andrew - Supernews (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Sean Donelan (Feb 07)
- Re: question on ptr rr Lou Katz (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Niels Bakker (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Daniel Senie (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Arnold Nipper (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 09)