nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ?
From: "Tom (UnitedLayer)" <tom () unitedlayer com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:49:41 -0800 (PST)
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Alexander Hagen wrote:
The PA-2FE-TX is about 1600.00- better to get a second PA-FE-TX with second VIP2-50 Now why is the CX-FEIP-2TX so much cheaper than the PA-2FE-TX ?????
I believe because the CX-FEIP-2TX is a full length card. The PA-2FE-TX also isn't able to handle a full 100Mbps per port, so don't be suprised if it doesn't work well :) VIP2/50 is a much better combo.
Current thread:
- Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Alexander Hagen (Feb 07)
- Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or othervendor ? sthaug (Feb 07)
- Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Alexander Hagen (Feb 07)
- RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Alexander Hagen (Feb 08)
- RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? jlewis (Feb 09)
- RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Tom (UnitedLayer) (Feb 09)
- Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 09)