nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast and windows servers
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 05:43:52 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Patrick W.Gilmore wrote:
Honestly, I do not know about OSPF (or BGP) on Windows, however, you can just static route to the Windows box(es). Sure, if the OS hangs, the interface will stay up and the static route will still push bits at the dead box, but it will work (FSVO "work"). Besides, how often does Windows crash? <snicker>
Hence the reason why I want the route to cease being advertised if the box "fails." I'm trying to avoid putting yet another server load balancer box in front of the windows box to withdraw the route so a different "working" box will be closest. It may be an oxymoron, but I'm trying to make the windows service (if not a particular windows box) as "reliable" as possible without introducing more boxes than necessary.
Current thread:
- Anycast and windows servers Sean Donelan (Feb 18)
- Re: Anycast and windows servers Joe Abley (Feb 19)
- Re: Anycast and windows servers Patrick W . Gilmore (Feb 19)
- Re: Anycast and windows servers Sean Donelan (Feb 20)
- Re: Anycast and windows servers Alex Bligh (Feb 20)
- Re: Anycast and windows servers Robert Boyle (Feb 20)
- Re: Anycast and windows servers Daniel Senie (Feb 20)
- Re: Anycast and windows servers Sean Donelan (Feb 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Anycast and windows servers Buhrmaster, Gary (Feb 20)
- Re: Anycast and windows servers Steve Francis (Feb 20)