nanog mailing list archives
Re: 168.0.0.0/6
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:35:06 -0800 (PST)
This has been mentioned on nanog maillist before, it appears several months after notification swisscom still has not fixed this problem (when similar leak came from he, I think they fixed it in 48 hours!). Here are pointers to previous thread: http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2003-11/msg00626.html http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2003-11/msg00636.html On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bgp 169.223.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 168.0.0.0/6, version 7688303 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 194.85.4.249 from 194.85.4.249 (194.85.4.249) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best*> 24.0.0.0 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 60.0.0.0/7 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 62.0.0.0 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 63.0.0.0 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 64.0.0.0/6 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 68.0.0.0/7 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 70.0.0.0 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 80.0.0.0/6 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 84.0.0.0 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 128.0.0.0/3 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 160.0.0.0/5 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 168.0.0.0/6 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 199.0.0.0/8 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 200.0.0.0/7 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 202.0.0.0/7 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 204.0.0.0/6 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 208.0.0.0/7 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 210.0.0.0/7 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 212.0.0.0/7 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 216.0.0.0/8 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 217.0.0.0/8 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 218.0.0.0/7 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 220.0.0.0/7 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 i *> 222.0.0.0/8 194.85.4.249 0 3277 13062 20485 20485 20485 8437 3303 ithis seems to cause some strangeness when one's block is having various announcement problems and falls within swisscom's imperialistic reach. is cousin george doing their routing policy? :-) randy
Current thread:
- 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Daniel Karrenberg (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Joe Provo (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Joe Provo (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Daniel Karrenberg (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Andre Chapuis (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 william(at)elan.net (Feb 24)
- RE: 168.0.0.0/6 Jeroen Massar (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)